On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:00:16PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Aren't all the bits in "bcm1480_regs.h" meant to be prefixed with > BCM1480_DUART? If these are to be the same as for the BCM1250, then they > can probably be defined "in sb1250_regs.h" unconditionally. > > These headers are a horrible mess anyway -- a single definition should be > enough to access the two DUARTs the BCM1480 seems to have... The headers are autogenerated by Broadcom; they got some header-o-matic which from a common source base will generate headers for Linux and several other operating systems by adding (C) headers etc. Which makes sorting them tricky ... Ralf
