On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 11:22:23AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:39:32 +0200, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > This MIPS implementation is derived (and stripped) from the SH > > > implementation. > > > > Why is this not in architecture-independent code? > > Yes, this is architecture independent. If we could have consensus on > a generic (or least common) implementation, we can put it outside arch > directory. > > But I gave up for now ;) I will leave all implementation for platform > code. I really dislike duplicating thing over architectures. If you copy code from another architecture the first though should be 'could and should this be generic ?'. So please try to get this lifted to common code instead of duplicating it. > > --- > Atsushi Nemoto ---end quoted text---
