Re: [PATCH 15/15] work around for more than 256MB memory support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/6/07, tiansm@xxxxxxxxxx <tiansm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@xxxxxxxxxx>

Signed-off-by: Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/char/mem.c |    4 ++++
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/mem.c b/drivers/char/mem.c
index cc9a9d0..a19b46a 100644
--- a/drivers/char/mem.c
+++ b/drivers/char/mem.c
@@ -82,8 +82,12 @@ static inline int uncached_access(struct file *file, unsigned long addr)
         */
        if (file->f_flags & O_SYNC)
                return 1;
+#if defined(CONFIG_LEMOTE_FULONG) && defined(CONFIG_64BIT)
+       return (addr >= __pa(high_memory)) || ((addr >=0x10000000) && (addr < 0x20000000));
+#else
        return addr >= __pa(high_memory);
 #endif
+#endif
 }

That would be nice to have a nice log to justify such a hack....

Thanks
--
              Franck


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux