On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:26:56PM +0900, Yoichi Yuasa wrote: > I think that au_readl() is correct here. Yes - even though the difference is only cosmetic and au_readl() etc. operations essentially are equivalent to __raw_readX / __raw_writeX anyway (or their modern equivalents), so maybe the should simply be replaced. Anyway, applied. Thanks, Ralf
