On 5/14/07, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007 09:55:01 +0200, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Without that, fresh build will fail because missing-syscalls target
> > requires include/asm, etc.
>
> yes but from top makefile, we already have this depedency:
>
> $ grep archprepare: Makefile
> archprepare: prepare1 scripts_basic
Yes, and arch Makefile is included _before_ the line. So "make" will
try to build arch-missing-syscalls before prepare1.
hmm okay. But this depedency is not really nice IMHO...
Something weird is that if you do this on top of your patch, it seems to work:
diff --git a/arch/mips/Makefile b/arch/mips/Makefile
index 5aa0f41..04a57f9 100644
--- a/arch/mips/Makefile
+++ b/arch/mips/Makefile
@@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ ifdef CONFIG_MIPS32_O32
$(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=. missing-syscalls EXTRA_CFLAGS="-mabi=32"
endif
-archprepare: arch-missing-syscalls
+prepare0: arch-missing-syscalls
archclean:
@$(MAKE) $(clean)=arch/mips/boot
It seems that we can't rely on the order of the execution of megerd
prerequisites...
--
Franck
