On Fri, 11 May 2007 14:51:14 +0100, Thiemo Seufer <ths@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > woah, quite a lot of works are waiting for you ;) > > AFAICS everything except utimensat is a false positive. Well, fadvise64_64 is not a false positive, isn't it? LFS version of posix_fadvise needs fadvise64_64, not fadvise64. And anyway fadvise64_64 needs some fix to adjust longlong argument as I said before. --- Atsushi Nemoto
