Re: Some potential FPU emulator problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 1 May 2007 23:52:14 +0100, Thiemo Seufer <ths@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [<80042ed0>] force_sig_info+0xa4/0xf8
> [<80017f1c>] do_tr+0xb4/0x134
> [<800111e0>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x20
> [<80021dac>] ieee754sp_format+0x28/0x50c
> [<80027e14>] ieee754sp_fdp+0x94/0x3d0
> [<80020194>] fpu_emulator_cop1Handler+0x1334/0x1b40
> [<80017934>] do_cpu+0x344/0x380
> [<800111e0>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x20

Is this kernel contain commit ba755f8ec80fdbf2b5212622eabf7355464c6327 ?
I suppose the fix might show you a little bit better result.

> Without this patch the same configuration boot fine. I don't know i
> f this just means one of the asserts is broken or if there is
> something wrong with the FPU emulation.

Perhaps the triggered assert() is the first one in ieee754sp_format(),
but I do not know if it was a proper test...

---
Atsushi Nemoto


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux