On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:24:24PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 02:46:25PM -0500, Peter Watkins wrote: > > > The siginfo field si_fd is incorrect on n64 because the band field does > > not match glibc. > > Susv3 says: > > [...] > The <signal.h> header shall define the siginfo_t type as a structure that > includes at least the following members: > > [...] > long si_band Band event for SIGPOLL. > [...] > > So the kernel is right, glibc is wrong I'd say ... This will break the ABI only for uses of si_band and si_fd, and only on n64. Anyone see a reason why I shouldn't change glibc? Ralf, as I mentioned on IRC, I've got bigger worries about siginfo. Shouldn't n32 be using the same siginfo as o32? It's got pointers in it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery
