Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:26:29 -0600 > Marc St-Jean <stjeanma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > + status = *(volatile u32 *)up->port.private_data; > > It distresses me that this patch uses a variable which this patch > doesn't initialise anywhere. It isn't complete. > > The sub-driver code whch sets up this field shuld be included in the > patch, no? > OK, I'll re-post with the platform file which initializes the variable. That file however will reference other files in the platform which has not been posted yet. I thought it was better to post the driver-only code. Marc
