On 2/12/07, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_ret_from_irq is used by dec/int-handler.S directly, so you should not
remove it (though decstation_defconfig disables CONFIG_PREEMPT).
woah, you're right. the name '_ret_from_irq' looks so private to me
that I didn't think that some other code could use it...
But looking at dec/int-handler.S again, I can not see why it uses
_ret_from_irq, and why it manipulates TI_REGS($28) in handle_it ...
It seems dec/int-handler.S has been broken for a while. I'll send a
patch to fix it. If it was ACKed, I ACK your patch.
ok I'm waiting...
--
Franck
