Re: [PATCH 0/10] Clean up signal code [take #3]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Atsushi Nemoto" <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Clean up signal code [take #3]
From: "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:55:20 +0100
Cc: ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070208.010430.58789357.anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <11706854683935-git-send-email-fbuihuu@xxxxxxxxx> <20070208.010430.58789357.anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Atsushi

Thanks for you review !

On 2/7/07, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

# Though [PATCH 6/10] failed due to recent whitespace cleanup ...


I can rebase it if needed,

I hope this patchset applied before updating my fp_context patches.


yeah I hope too...

--
              Franck

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/10] Clean up signal code [take #3]
  - From: Franck Bui-Huu

References:
- [PATCH 0/10] Clean up signal code [take #3]
  - From: Franck Bui-Huu
- Re: [PATCH 0/10] Clean up signal code [take #3]
  - From: Atsushi Nemoto

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 9/10] signal: do not use save_static_function() anymore
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Clean up signal code [take #3]
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Clean up signal code [take #3]
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Clean up signal code [take #3]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux