On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 09:39:42AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> - unquoted > > While doing the C99 conversion I notices that the top level sh64 > directory was using the binary number for CTL_KERN. That is a > no-no so I removed the support for the sysctl binary interface > only leaving sysctl /proc support. > > At least the sysctl tables were placed at the end of > the list so user space did not see this mistake. > > Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Looks good, thanks Eric. Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
