Re: [PATCH] [MIPS] Fixed PCI resource fixup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:31:16 +0000
Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:55:58PM +0900, Yoichi Yuasa wrote:
> 
> > This patch has fixed IDE resources problem about Cobalt.
> > 
> > pcibios_fixup_device_resources() changes non-movable resources.
> > It cannot be changed if there is IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED in the resource flags. 
> 
> <Ralf> anemo: Have you seen Yoichi's patch?
> <anemo> Ralf: yes, but I could not see why ...  My impression is IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED and io_offset adjustment is irrerevant.
> <Ralf> This whole fixup thing is really meant to handle machines where there is an offset between PCI bus addresses and CPU physical addresses.
> <Ralf> And that exists regardless of IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED
> <anemo> I thought so too.  So I can not see why youichi's patch fix something.
> <Ralf> This may be the explanation:
> <Ralf> static struct pci_controller cobalt_pci_controller = {
> <Ralf>         .pci_ops        = &gt64111_pci_ops,
> <Ralf>         .mem_resource   = &cobalt_mem_resource,
> <Ralf>         .mem_offset     = 0,
> <Ralf>         .io_resource    = &cobalt_io_resource,
> <Ralf>         .io_offset      = 0 - GT_DEF_PCI0_IO_BASE,
> <Ralf> };
> <Ralf> I think he should have io_offset = 0.

When I tried io_offset = 0, tulip net driver didn't work.

> Which is what other GT-64120 platforms are using, so I wonder why that is
> different on Cobalt.

I don't know, but io_offset is needed for Cobalt.

Yoichi


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux