Re: [PATCH 2.6.18] declance: Support the I/O ASIC LANCE w/o TURBOchannel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18] declance: Support the I/O ASIC LANCE w/o TURBOchannel
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 12:06:08 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20061201214626.1c50dd38.akpm@xxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0611301306460.1757@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45710CFE.5090007@xxxxxxxxx> <20061201214626.1c50dd38.akpm@xxxxxxxx>

On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > can you (or Andrew) please resend your patches against 2.6.19?
> > 
> 
> I have then all (I think) queued up.  Will send once I've done a round
> of build-testing.

 Thanks a lot, Andrew.

  Maciej

References:
- [PATCH 2.6.18] declance: Support the I/O ASIC LANCE w/o TURBOchannel
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.18] declance: Support the I/O ASIC LANCE w/o TURBOchannel
  - From: Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.18] declance: Support the I/O ASIC LANCE w/o TURBOchannel
  - From: Andrew Morton

Prev by Date: [2.4 PATCH] mips/mips64 mv64340 parenthesis fixes
Next by Date: Re: [2.4 PATCH] mips/mips64 mv64340 parenthesis fixes
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18] declance: Support the I/O ASIC LANCE w/o TURBOchannel
Next by thread: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux