On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:37:32 +0200, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I would rather move this fix into initrd start setup function as it > was done by old code. We know that some bootloaders forget sign > extension on 64 bits kernel. But if for example the sign extension is > forgotten by a board specific code, we shouldn't automatically fix the > mistake, but rather fix the board specific code. So I would do instead > of your fix: But we need sign extension for values comes from the initrd_header anyway. The initrd_header is fixed-size and can not hold 64-bit address. --- Atsushi Nemoto
