Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:48:37 +0200, Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > thanks but it doesn't explain anything either...Anyways what about this > > patch on top of the previous one ? > > > + initrd_header = __va(PAGE_ALIGN(__pa_symbol(&_end) + sizeof(u32) * 2 + 1)); > > This breaks the addinitrd. You mean this perhaps? > > initrd_header = __va(PAGE_ALIGN(__pa_symbol(&_end) + sizeof(u32) * 2)) - sizeof(u32) * 2; > > > BTW, I'm a bit uncomfortable with current automatic initrd detection. > Now we have rd_start= option. If I enabled BLK_DEV_INITRD and did > pass nfsroot= instead of rd_start= option, I want kernel do not search > initrd_header at all. There's "noinitrd" for that purpose. Alos, one might want to use a built-in initrd plus nfsroot. Thiemo
