--- Mark E Mason <mark.e.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ralf will have to answer that one, but I believe it > was caught up in a > general housecleaning of the MMU/cache code. Ah! Can I use that as an excuse for never cleaning my house? :) Seriously, I wonder if it might be a good idea to have code due to be housecleaned (in any significant way) to have the old behaviour settable in a config flag, or make a reverse patch available somewhere? (What I'm trying to think of is a way for developers to put in the least extra effort but still leave an escape for people whose boards do really strange things.) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
