On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:01:14PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > I fail to see what was changed WRT SB1 CPUs by the suspected patch. > Though wait... the previous version was inconsistent, using the different > barrier definitions for C and assembly (nops in the former, and branch in > the latter). But since the assembly version was not really used, it > couldn't break anything... :-/ > > Anyway, shouldn't ssnop's be used for SB1 instead? CPU has quad-issue > pipeline, hasn't it? SB1 is almost fully interlocked so the right thing to do is doing nothing. Ralf
