On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 05:39:07PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > Well, if you need IRQ0 to be real then redefining is_real_interrupt() > is the correct way forward. > > However, Linus' policy is that IRQ0 shall be invalid at least on PCI > systems, and architectures _should_ remap their real IRQ0 to some other > number. Personally I don't like this. Hence why I prefer to give people > the option. I have no strong opinion either. In some cases not having interrupt 0 available sucks because Linux will have to use a different interrupt numbering than system documentation ... Ralf
