Re: [PATCH 6/7] Fix dump_stack()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> On Tue,  1 Aug 2006 11:27:16 +0200, Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> When CONFIG_KALLSYMS is not set stack local is not initialized. Therefore
>> show_trace() won't display anything useful. This patch uses
>> prepare_frametrace() to setup the stack pointer before calling
>> show_trace().
> 
> It's not a bug.  The original show_trace() needs an address on stack
> and dump_stack() surely give it by taking an address of local
> variable.
> 

sorry, was drunk when writing the commit message...

> Eliminating the #ifdef itself looks good, but if you cleared contents
> of the "regs" before prepare_frametrace, you will get less false
> entries in the output.
> 

well I don't see why...show_trace() is going to only use regs[29] which
is setup by prepare_frametrace()...

One other thing, why did you mark prepare_frametrace() as noinline ?
I would mark it as always_inline to get one less false entry in the
output.

		Franck


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux