TomOn Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:01:07 -0500, Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] diff -rup a/drivers/net/sb1250-mac.c b/drivers/net/sb1250-mac.c --- a/drivers/net/sb1250-mac.c 2006-03-09 04:25:41.000000000 -0600 +++ b/drivers/net/sb1250-mac.c 2006-03-09 05:30:52.000000000 -0600 [...] @@ -2079,13 +2095,31 @@ static irqreturn_t sbmac_intr(int irq,vo * Transmits on channel 0 */ +#if defined(CONFIG_SBMAC_NAPI) if (isr & (M_MAC_INT_CHANNEL << S_MAC_TX_CH0)) { - sbdma_tx_process(sc,&(sc->sbm_txdma)); + sbdma_tx_process(sc,&(sc->sbm_txdma), 0); } /* * Receives on channel 0 */ + if (isr & (M_MAC_INT_CHANNEL << S_MAC_RX_CH0)) { + if (netif_rx_schedule_prep(dev)) + { An irq could appear here. I am skeptical that it is safe to write the irq mask register so late. One should probably consider a break in the enclosing "for" loop too. + __raw_writeq(0, sc->sbm_imr); + __netif_rx_schedule(dev); + } + else + { } else {, please.
-- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Attachment:
mips-sb1250-mac-NAPI-5.patch
Description: Binary data