Re: au1000_lowlevel_probe on au1000_eth.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 07:03:51PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> 
>    This is against your rewrite, if I don't mistake?

Yes.

>    Hrm, wouldn't it be better to put this stuff into a separate function 
>    then?

Maybe, but I considered that these stuff are dignificative only during
boot time so I decided to do not consider them during wake up. Is that
wrong?

Ciao,

Rodolfo

-- 

GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail:    giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux Device Driver                             giometti@xxxxxxxxx
Embedded Systems                     		giometti@xxxxxxxx
UNIX programming                     phone:     +39 349 2432127

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux