On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:50:40 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > For example, in the code below, RDHWR is placed _before_ checking the > > error. I suppose these instructions were reordered by gcc's > > optimization, but the optimization would have large negative effect in > > this case. > > You'd have to figure out how to get GCC not to eagerly schedule the > rdhwr. This might be quite hard. I don't know much about this part of > the scheduler. I really did not understand yet how errno is bound TLS. I found some "rdhwr" in glibc-ports source code (tls-macros.h, nptl/tls.h). The RDHWR instruction in the example code comes from one of them, no? I also found a "rdhwr" in gcc's mips.md file ("tls_get_tp_<mode>"). Is this the origin? MD is a very foreign language for me... --- Atsushi Nemoto