On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 12:21:57AM +0400, Vitaly Wool wrote: > On 6/7/06, Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >This seems to be one of the serial bits for the ip3106 which must have > >been lost on the way to kernel.org. Unfortunately the original author > >does no longer take care of the code. I just took a stab at the PNX8550 > >code and it has a significant number of other problems. All small in > >the sum large enough such that I will mark PNX8550 support broken. > > I took an attempt to compile 2.6.16.20 kernel from linux-mips.org for > PNX8550 and it went a little further but also failed soon: > > CC arch/mips/philips/pnx8550/common/platform.o > /home/vital/work/opensource/linux- > 2.6.16.20/arch/mips/philips/pnx8550/common/platform.c:101: error: variable > `pnx8550_usb_ohci_device' has initializer but incomplete type > /home/vital/work/opensource/linux- > 2.6.16.20/arch/mips/philips/pnx8550/common/platform.c:102: error: unknown > field `name' specified in initializer > /home/vital/work/opensource/linux- > 2.6.16.20/arch/mips/philips/pnx8550/common/platform.c:102: warning: excess > elements in struct initializer > /home/vital/work/opensource/linux- > 2.6.16.20/arch/mips/philips/pnx8550/common/platform.c:102: warning: (near > initialization for `pnx8550_usb_ohci_device') > /home/vital/work/opensource/linux- > 2.6.16.20/arch/mips/philips/pnx8550/common/platform.c:103: error: unknown > field `id' specified in initializer > /home/vital/work/opensource/linux- > 2.6.16.20/arch/mips/philips/pnx8550/common/platform.c:103: warning: excess > elements in struct initializer > ... > /home/vital/work/opensource/linux- > 2.6.16.20/arch/mips/philips/pnx8550/common/platform.c:101: error: storage > size of `pnx8550_usb_ohci_device' isn't known > /home/vital/work/opensource/linux- > 2.6.16.20/arch/mips/philips/pnx8550/common/platform.c:112: error: storage > size of `pnx8550_uart_device' isn't known > make[2]: *** [arch/mips/philips/pnx8550/common/platform.o] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [arch/mips/philips/pnx8550/common] Error 2 > make: *** [vmlinux] Error 2 > > Does it make sense to try to fix those? Or will it only result in more > errore showing up next? There is a whole number of small problems such as this one but as far as I look at it all where only simple. Ralf
