Re: N32 sigset and __COMPAT_ENDIAN_SWAP__

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: N32 sigset and __COMPAT_ENDIAN_SWAP__
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 17:51:36 +0100
Cc: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606080134480.26638@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606080134480.26638@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:36:29AM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:

Interesting that a bug of this sort manages to survive for that long.
I guess it is proof that barely anybody is using 64-bit little endian,
yet we're cursed to support it.

  Ralf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: N32 sigset and __COMPAT_ENDIAN_SWAP__
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: N32 sigset and __COMPAT_ENDIAN_SWAP__
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- N32 sigset and __COMPAT_ENDIAN_SWAP__
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Prev by Date: Kernel binary size changes in dependence of the gcc version
Next by Date: Re: N32 sigset and __COMPAT_ENDIAN_SWAP__
Previous by thread: Re: N32 sigset and __COMPAT_ENDIAN_SWAP__
Next by thread: Re: N32 sigset and __COMPAT_ENDIAN_SWAP__
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux