On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:50:42AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Shouldn't affect this. What Atsushi is deleting are sections for DWARF > _1_, not DWARF _2_; that's ancient history. I don't know why they need > to be listed at all, though; I've never had a problem, and orphan > placement ought to take care of it. I think this goes back to this file being derived from one of the binutils generated ld scripts. Ralf
