Steven Rostedt wrote on Friday, April 14, 2006 2:19 PM > So the current solution has two flaws: > 1. not robust. If we someday add more modules that together take up > more than 14K, we need to manually update the PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM. > 2. waste of memory. We have 14K of memory wasted per CPU. Remember > a 64 processor machine would be wasting 896K of memory! If someone who has the money to own a 64-process machine, 896K of memory is pocket change ;-) - Ken
