Re: [PATCH] nullify __ide_flush_{prologue,epilogue} on UP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nullify __ide_flush_{prologue,epilogue} on UP
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 17:38:09 +0100
Cc: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060408.012511.75185496.anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20060408.012511.75185496.anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 01:25:11AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good, applied.

Actually I have my objections wrt to shared caches such as with SMP on
the 34K but that's another project.

  Ralf

References:
- [PATCH] nullify __ide_flush_{prologue,epilogue} on UP
  - From: Atsushi Nemoto

Prev by Date: [PATCH] use __ffs() instead of ffs() on waybit calculation
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] use __ffs() instead of ffs() on waybit calculation
Previous by thread: [PATCH] nullify __ide_flush_{prologue,epilogue} on UP
Next by thread: [PATCH] use __ffs() instead of ffs() on waybit calculation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux