On Wednesday 01 February 2006 10:26, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Wednesday 01 February 2006 10:02, Akinobu Mita wrote: > > > >>+static inline unsigned int hweight32(unsigned int w) > [] > > How large are these functions on x86? Maybe it would be better to not inline them, > > but put it into some C file out of line. > > hweight8 47 bytes > hweight16 76 bytes > hweight32 97 bytes > hweight64 56 bytes (NOT inlining hweight32) > hweight64 197 bytes (inlining hweight32) > > Those are when compiled as separate non-inlined functions, > with pushl %ebp and ret. This would argue for moving them out of line. -Andi
