Re: Compiling a non-pic glibc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Alex Gonzalez <langabe@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Compiling a non-pic glibc
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:11:14 +0000
Cc: linux-mips <linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <c58a7a270601120218r77ec0d8drf2d14663138a13c2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <c58a7a270601120218r77ec0d8drf2d14663138a13c2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:18:03AM +0000, Alex Gonzalez wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> What is the correct way of cross-compiling a non-pic static glibc?

Forget it.  The non-PIC support for glibc is rotting away since ages.

Why do you want a non-PIC glibc?

  Ralf

References:
- Compiling a non-pic glibc
  - From: Alex Gonzalez

Prev by Date: Re: gcc -3.4.4 and linux-2.4.32
Next by Date: Re: atomic_add function on memory allocated with dma_alloc_coherent hangs
Previous by thread: Re: Compiling a non-pic glibc
Next by thread: does the linux kernel use k0, k1 regs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux