On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 01:28:43PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > I don't read the 2.6 code,but it seems it remains the same as the copy > > in 2.4(except that #ifdef changes).I can't see why the code is broken? > > In case you mean the ioport address,mips_io_port_base for that board is > > 0xa0000000, inb(0x14000060) is reading from 0xb4000060, which is correct > > for it. > > Shouldn't mips_io_port_base be 0xb4000000 for your board, so inb(0x60) looks > more like a PC-style keyboard controller access? Exactly. Anyway - what this did actually demonstrate is that at least there's no 2.6 user of the IT8172. Ralf
