Re: unkillable process due to setup_frame() failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

> So my "which is preferred" question was inappropriate.  I had to ask
> "#1 or #2 or both or other ?"

 We should be consistent with other platforms -- having a look at e.g. the 
i386 (as it used to be the reference) and the alpha (as close-enough to 
MIPS) should reveal the answer.  IIRC, a SIGSEGV that has a handler 
installed, but which cannot be callled due to a bad stack pointer is 
forced to SIG_DFL, but you may want to double-check it.

  Maciej


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux