>>>>> On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:08:34 +0100 (BST), "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: macro> That's how other architectures do this, see e.g. macro> "arch/alpha/kernel/time.c". Why should we be different, even macro> for now? Please elaborate more ? Do you mean we should implement default rtc_set_mmss() and take the rtc_lock in it ? Or do you mean we should take rtc_lock in each board-dependent rtc_set_time/rtc_set_time ? macro> Also the call is named rtc_set_mmss() for an unknown reason macro> while all the others have set_rtc_mmss(). IIRC, you are (one of) the godfather of the function, aren't you? :-) --- Atsushi Nemoto
