On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > Well, since they use a different controller structure and different > > functions, the user-visible name should be different too, shouldn't it? > > To be original ;-) -- how about "MIPS-MT"? > > Thought about but then it's still hammering at the same old bits which > now just have received a different use. Using another structure is enough for justification -- it's a different "controller". Similarly the two variations of interrupts handled in arch/mips/dec/ioasic-irq.c are almost the same (the difference is even smaller than here), but using separate structures made me use different names. Maciej
