Jerry wrote:
>
> A kind of lame offtopic question :)
> What reason in 2.6 to do structure init in this way:
> struct a = {
> .name = value
> ...
>
> instead of 2.4-like:
> struct a = {
> name: value
> ...
>
> Is this a bad form to use ".name" in 2.4 or "name:" in 2.6?
name: is the obsolete GNU gcc extension, .name = is C99. The C99 style
is strongly preferred now.
Thiemo
