On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Pete Popov wrote: > Try the attached patch instead. Apart from other changes why not simply s/bal/jal/? Your proposed code is bad if ever to be built to a 64-bit object. Maciej
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Pete Popov wrote: > Try the attached patch instead. Apart from other changes why not simply s/bal/jal/? Your proposed code is bad if ever to be built to a 64-bit object. Maciej
|