On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > They are not in the info pages, but that should probably be considered an > > accidental omission. Is using something that's documented but doesn't > > work, to the contrary, any better? > > Probably not. It's just that I've never seen actual use of -mel/-meb yet. Good -- it means you haven't been watching over my shoulder. ;-) I've used them several times for big-endian builds with my toolchain, which, as you may be aware, has been exclusively little-endian so far. And they are actually used to implement these "-EL" and "-EB" options. Frankly I find "-mel" and "-meb" more consistent with the others as "-m*" generally imply target-specific options. Maciej
