On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 06:03:16PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 03:19:38PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > > Subject: [patch] blast_scache nop for sc cpus without scache > > Interesting. Which system needs this patch? RM400; looks like the secondary cache on the cpu module isn't normally attached, but like the board caches on den Indy. CONF_SC isn't set in cp0 config, but the cpu is an R4400SC -> crash in r4k_scache_blast*. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
