Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Don't expect that sending a patch once always leads > to it's prompt > acceptance. Pushing a patch *can* involve resending > it multiple times, > over a long period of time. However, if a patch is > in acceptable state > (that is, a half-way readable coding style, no > superfluous debugging > output, ...), Ralf usually takes it quite fast. Ok, I'll retry. > That isn't all that easy, especially with CVS and > especially if you want > to keep patches in nicely separated changesets. With > CVS, this > unfortunately involves some manual work, or clever > scripting. Actually that's what I was looking for... Cheers. Francis ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger est arrivé ! Découvrez toutes les nouveautés pour dialoguer instantanément avec vos amis. A télécharger gratuitement sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com