I find this message, http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2004-10/msg00256.html Thank you for reply. > On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 05:53:02PM +0900, Tatsuya Koseki wrote: > > > Subject: kernel 2.6.9 patch > > Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:53:02 +0900 > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > charset="iso-2022-jp" > > > > Please review > > > > > > --- linux/include/asm/stackframe.h.old Tue Dec 14 17:49:38 2004 > > +++ linux/include/asm/stackframe.h Tue Dec 14 17:50:35 2004 > > @@ -244,6 +244,10 @@ > > nor v1, $0, v1 > > and v0, v1 > > or v0, a0 > > + > > + li v1,2 > > + or v0,v1 > > + > > mtc0 v0, CP0_STATUS > > LONG_L v1, PT_EPC(sp) > > MTC0 v1, CP0_EPC > > o Your patch got corrupted by using a differnet indentation so couldn't be > applied anyway > o When posting a patch, post an explanation. If the purpose of a patch > isn't obvious it'll likely be ignroed. > o This bug was already fixed in CVS. > o The issue only affected new-born processes, so there is no reason to > burden the fix on every exception taken. > o Why using two instruction if one would be sufficient. > > Ralf >
