Re: [PATCH] Improve atomic.h implementation robustness

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




And what constraints are there on
your choice of gcc version? - it would be easier if 3.4 was OK.


3.2/3.3 are known to work. 3.4 fails for yet unknown reason, I guess
either due to inline assembler changes or more agressive dead code
elimination.


Thiemo

For what it's worth, I'm running 64-bit kernels on my O2 and Indy that were compiled with gcc 3.4.3, and I have had no problems.


Steve



[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux