On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > No surprise as the "o" constraint doesn't mean anything particular for > > MIPS. All addresses are offsettable -- there is no addressing mode that > > would preclude it, so "o" is exactly the same as "m". > > This is what the gcc docs say: [...] > So it is not the same as "m". It is the same *for* MIPS. Not in general. Maciej
