Re: [PATCH] Improve o32 syscall handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 05:45:57PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> 
> > For the 64bit Kernel, it
> >  - checks for unaligned user stack
> 
> Why bother, the unaligned exception handler should take care of this.

It really does so for unaligned accesses from kernel space?

> >  - also allows now up to 8 arguments
> 
> Quite frankly I'd prefer to see this being handle in userspace.  For o32
> it's too late to go for that but for N32 / N64 we still may have a chance.

My changes are for O32 only. N32/N64 doesn't need more than 6 arguments.

> > -	LONG_L	a2, TI_FLAGS($28)	# current->work
> > +	lw	a2, TI_FLAGS($28)	# current->work
> 
> Flags is a long variable.

"long" isn't a quantity the assembler knows about. :-)

The whole assembler file for O32 support in 32bit Kernels makes only
sense when it is compiled as 32bit code. In that case, the C "long"
has 4 bytes and is loaded with lw. Using a macro which abstracts for
32/64bit compilation hides this needlessly, and can even lead to the
erraneous impression the code would be useful for 64bit, too.


Thiemo


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux