On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 04:41:44PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:25:09 +0200 > Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > IMHO breaking the build unnecessarily is extremly bad because > > it will prevent all testing. And would you really want to hold > > up the whole linux testing machinery just for some obscure > > system call? IMHO not a good tradeoff. > > Then change the unistd.h cookie from "#error" to a "#warning". It > accomplishes both of our goals. #warnings would be fine for me. -Andi
