Re: PATCH

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 10 Oct 2004, Pete Popov wrote:

> > If not, why not use a data type that covers
> > valid offsets only when passing addresses to bus access functions? 
> 
> The attribute and memory pcmcia addresses are just stored in these 
> variables, and then the upper pcmcia stack layer calls ioremap on these 
> addresses. Thus, you need the 36 bit I/O address patch, as well as the 
> tiny pcmcia patch.
> 
> The pcmcia I/O address is ioremapped at the socket driver level. If that 
> was the case with the mem and attribute addresses, I wouldn't need this 
> 64 bit pcmcia patch. But since it's the upper pcmcia layer that ioremaps 
> these addresses, I need to store tham in 64 bit types.

 OK, but then phys_t should be used for ioaddr_t universally, shouldn't
it?  Any architecture can have the controller seen in a 64-bit memory
space, after all.

  Maciej


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux