Re: __stq_u parameter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Pavel Kiryukhin <savl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: __stq_u parameter
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:59:46 +0200
Cc: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4152EABF.1020007@dev.rtsoft.ru>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <4152EABF.1020007@dev.rtsoft.ru>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 07:24:47PM +0400, Pavel Kiryukhin wrote:

> Sorry,
> does this make sense for 2.4.x kernels?

Once uppon a time it made ...

The file has been rewritten completly since then.

Thanks anyway,

  Ralf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: __stq_u parameter (and related XFS filesystem 1.3 & 1.3.1 problems on 2.4.x)
  - From: Pavel Kiryukhin

References:
- __stq_u parameter
  - From: Pavel Kiryukhin

Prev by Date: Re: CPU frequency scaling on MIPS (au1000/common/power.c)
Next by Date: Re: Kernel 2.6 for R4600 Indy
Previous by thread: __stq_u parameter
Next by thread: Re: __stq_u parameter (and related XFS filesystem 1.3 & 1.3.1 problems on 2.4.x)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux