Is the suggested patch below going to be added to CVS or is considered too experimental to add ?
>No and yes - but here is a simpler solution. Below patch solves the
>problem and adds just 32 bytes of code but removes the special case for
>TX49/H2 entirely.
> Ralf
> arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c | 59
>-------------------------------------------- include/asm-mips/r4kcache.h | 18
>++++++++-----
> include/asm-mips/war.h | 14 ----------
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>
>
>Index: arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c
>===================================================================
>RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c,v
>retrieving revision 1.88
>diff -u -r1.88 c-r4k.c
>--- arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c 16 Jul 2004 12:06:13 -0000 1.88
>+++ arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c 16 Jul 2004 12:17:05 -0000
>@@ -96,16 +96,6 @@
> r4k_blast_dcache = blast_dcache32;
> }
>problem and adds just 32 bytes of code but removes the special case for
>TX49/H2 entirely.
> Ralf
> arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c | 59
>-------------------------------------------- include/asm-mips/r4kcache.h | 18
>++++++++-----
> include/asm-mips/war.h | 14 ----------
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>
>
>Index: arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c
>===================================================================
>RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c,v
>retrieving revision 1.88
>diff -u -r1.88 c-r4k.c
>--- arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c 16 Jul 2004 12:06:13 -0000 1.88
>+++ arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c 16 Jul 2004 12:17:05 -0000
>@@ -96,16 +96,6 @@
> r4k_blast_dcache = blast_dcache32;
> }
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
