Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 cgd@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> At Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:22:29 +0000 (UTC), "Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote:
> > (this has led to an address shift enlarging the
> > patch significantly, unfortunately).
> 
> maybe add nops to pad, instead?

 Well, addresses have been shifted down, so you'd have to remove 
something.  I suppose the break tests could be moved to the end of file, 
but I fail to see an advantage.  Test cases that embed addresses in output 
patterns are doomed to suffer from such changes.

  Maciej


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux