Re: possible overflow in __udelay

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 23:57:23 +0900 (JST), Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:

anemo> I believe, for example, mdelay(10) does not work properly on
anemo> most MIPS ports (except for DECSTATION and JAZZ which have
anemo> smaller HZ value).

Oops, mdelay(10) should work.  But mdelay(5) (mdelay(MAX_UDELAY_MS))
does not work.

---
Atsushi Nemoto


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux