On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 cgd@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > personally, i'd make the comment on the 'break' testcase in mips32.s a bit > clearer and more explicit. e.g. "for a while, break for mips32 > took a 20 bit code. But that was incompatible and caused problems, so > now it's back to the old 10 bit code, or two comma-separated 10 bit codes." No problem. > Otherwise, people might look and say "huh?" ;-)
